Browsed by
Month: June 2019

The Proof of Truth Is Inherent in Language

The Proof of Truth Is Inherent in Language

Comments 0 Comment

My goal in writing is two fold: 

1) That I understand the Truth.
2) That others understand the Truth.

Writing is a mental process that forces a rigor of logic upon thought.  Thought without writing is less rigorous, less logical, less thorough and less self-critical.  Writing provides an immediate feedback loop regarding  precision of ideas and logical concepts.

I’ve written elsewhere that logic is non-existent without language and that the different languages provide a different filter of reality, logic and limitations to thought.  Here’s the link.

Truth is a conveyed belief that, in total, extends beyond one’s ability to independently ascertain.  By this I mean that I am not God — I don’t sit outside all of Creation in a position from which to judge what is true.

That I speak a language conveys the principle that Truth exists and that I am able to approach it in a meaningful way.  It doesn’t mean I can be omniscient, or even fully know that I am correct, but the very use of language is predicated upon it’s utility.  …

Read More Read More

An Establishment of Religion

An Establishment of Religion

Comments 0 Comment

A “religion,” is not just the notion of “God” or a Creator.  A religion is a world view,  systemic understand of our place in the Cosmos, where we came from and where we are going.   A religion has a set of core beliefs, and a priesthood to propagate and protect the beliefs. The major religions have have a core set of written texts that provide the intellectual foundation for that religions.

These are obvious in Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, and even Buddhism . They have priests, holy writings, ceremonies, and easily identified leaders and formal structures.

But there is one religion that stands over all the religions in this age, and it the one religion that does not call itself a religion.  It is the religion that has, with subtlety, reduced all other religions beneath itself by taking upon itself the presumption that it stands outside and above religions.  It imposes, almost unconsciously, on the world the idea that it cannot be questioned (as religions MUST not be questioned, for questioning the faith is to be anathema.  This Not Religion is, after all , a faith.  If one choses not to believe, they are not off the faith, not of the faithful, and not of the truth).

…

Read More Read More

Inversion, Truth, and Genesis

Inversion, Truth, and Genesis

Comments 0 Comment

On a long drive this morning I listened to Vox Day and Black Pigeon.   Vox Day talked about “inversion,” which is the act of, essentially, lying on a civilizational scale.

Calling biological males a “female,” and expecting the entire culture to go along with it is an act of “inversion.”  Convincing people that entropy works in reverse (the theory of Evolution) is inversion.   Calling evil (like homosexuality) good and good (male/female marriage) evil is inversion.

The most important Scripture in the whole Bible in Genesis 1:1 — “In the Beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”   From this position flows all other truths.

The big inversion imposed is that man created God to explain the inexplicable. This is inversion.  This is the Big Lie. …

Read More Read More

Mixing the Nations

Mixing the Nations

Comments 0 Comment

The ongoing project of mixing White European nations appears, at first glance, to be a natural flow of people moving to a better life.  Perhaps that’s how it’s designed to be viewed —  the cult of “fairness” demands people accept this.

Upon deeper inspection it appears to be a migration driven by hidden and not so hidden actors.  From our wars, to George Soros, to the Pope, to Pueblo Sin Fronteras, legal help groups, the Democrat Party (who wants the votes), the Republican Party (who wants cheap labor) to the already embedded foreign peoples in Europe supporting the Leftist political parties, to virtually every university whose project it has been for a couple generations now (at least since the 1960s) to completely “de-construct” Western Civilization.

It’s working.

…

Read More Read More

Recommendation: “It Could Happen Here”

Recommendation: “It Could Happen Here”

Comments 0 Comment

A recurring theme I ponder is where, how, and if Right and Left can meet and I seem to have found some overlap in a Podcast called “It Could Happen Here.

But first let me tell you about  a colleague who proudly proclaims to be an international socialist and yet we agree on so much.

I,  despite having spent almost all off my academic years imbibing in the Marxism of Latin American history, am profoundly reactionary (if you consider what I’ve written elsewhere on this blog).

Nevertheless, Mr. Socialist International and I, when projecting far enough into the future have some common conclusions.  In a nutshell, civilizational reset, which comes through wars and other disasters.   Not good news,  but not unexpected from thinkers who embrace the reality of history and don’t pretend that we are ever coming closer to an earthly nirvana or heaven on earth.   …

Read More Read More

Hate and Sickness

Hate and Sickness

Comments 0 Comment

Most people look around to see where the crowd is running and follow. 

Everyone has “scriptures” that guide them.  For some it’s the Washington Post. Or  Vogue magazine.  Or whatever is on CNN.  Or the sociology class they took decades ago. I would like to think that the writings that guide me most are old school, written in Hebrew and Greek.  Those writings are in the Bible.  No apologies.  

I hate the whiny freaks who say “you can’t say that!” and claim to be so tolerant and diverse.  I don’t believe in tolerance.  At least I’m not a hypocrite on that point.

How is it that people can look themselves in the mirror and say with a straight face that it’s good to cut off a man’s testicles, drill a hole, inject him with estrogen and then claim something good happened? That is really sick. 

…

Read More Read More

Retaking the Homelands

Retaking the Homelands

Comments 0 Comment

If the African Blacks can retake their “homeland” in South Africa, then can the French and Swedes re-take their homelands is Europe?  If not, why not?

White South Africans face genocide. No one cares, especially the SJWs whose job it is too care.  

When the Swedish people (as improbable as it seems) rise up an drive out the African, Asian and Muslim, will anyone care?   

There shouldn’t be any objection at all if one considers how the world is ignoring the plight of Christians in the Middle East and Africa or the Boers in the land their fore-father’s settled.

Just food for thought.