White & Christian Nations

The stark failure of economic Marxism— classical Marxism — in the Soviet Union and China is universally recognized.   There just aren’t many classical Marxists left who want a society that looks like the old USSR nor China under Mao — it just didn’t work.

People woke up.  Nobody that is productive wants to share their wealth with the unproductive. And if they are forced to, history proves that they join the unproductive and nothing works at all.   

The abolition of private property is against human nature and that is OK.

  It used to be, in the earlier days of the USSR, that anyone whispering such heresy would be hauled off to a re-education center to rot for a few years.  They would be stripped of privileges (everything is a privilege in a totalitarian society, even the right to eat and breathe), lose their job, education, home, children and off they would go as someone truly the enemy of humanity, deplorable people, non-citizens.

In 2019 the totalitarian impulse strives not for forced sharing of property, rather it is a forced belief that “we are all equal,” and “diversity is good,” and “we must integrate.”  And a lot of people, perhaps most, don’t even question this, just like most Russians didn’t question Marxism in 1950. For to question is to become a heretic, a deplorable, a non-citizen and to risk assault and the loss of ones education and livelihood.

Yet this moral demand for integration/diversity is as unnatural and unsustainable as the demand for the abolition of private property.  It is truly inhuman.

So let me confess my sins, Comrade. …

Read More Read More

It’s a funny title, right? I mean, who would even bring that subject up?  Normies are terrified of the most remote association with white nationalism, or white separatism, which translates into the unforgivable sin, the Scarlett Letter of the Twenty-First Century.  It is worse — much worse — that being a child molester (I don’t see Hillary Clinton or Mitt Romney shedding any crocodile tears about Eptein’s crimes against children).

But these things need to be thought about.

 It is completely unnatural and a-historic to mix bloodlines (races) and then to expect universal harmony and joy. On the contrary, the mixing of races has always been a project of either conquest, or control.   The ancient world had no problem extinguishing bloodlines or mixing bloodlines such that nationalities (which are bloodlines) are forced to fight each other for survival instead of using their strength to resist a distant tyrant.   And once the tyrant is kicked over, the bloodlust brewing for centuries is unleashed an murder and mayhem take over.  Completing the circle, and new tyrant takes over and enforces order by their own violence.  Consider the fate of Yugoslavia over the last thirty years and you get the idea.   The nations broke apart and started the melee.  An external Force imposed “peace” through a campaign of aerial bombardment upon peoples of no relation to them whatsoever.

You and I have neighbors.  Me, and mine, live in my home. We have fences that are respected.  My neighbor is free to knock on my door and say hello and even ask for a favor, a cup of sugar, or whatever it is. And the better we get a long, the more likely I am to render assistance.  But that neighbor has no right to enter my home. He has no right to stand up on my lawn or even walk up my driveway.   He has no right to sit on my couch nor speak arrogantly toward me or my family when he is in my home. …

Read More Read More

There is a project to force the integration of bloodlines.  This is Blacks.  Asians. Mexicans.  Europeans.  So-Called “Indigenous” peoples.  Forced integration into Europe and North America.  (But racial purification in Southern Africa — exterminating the Whites — seems to be ignored. Ironic how hypocritical this is.)

The theory of the Liberal Progressive Westerners is that we all must learn to be tolerant and get along and that the “bad” people aren’t the backward uneducated non-Whites (this is implied in their argument), rather the White’s themselves, because upon whom else will they ply their guilt manipulation? Certainly not the oppressed non-whites!

And so when they come, by the millions, and they drive over people, and shoot people, and knife people, and bomb people, and rape white boys and girls, and cut the clitoris off of young girls — it becomes the White’s problem (in their mind) for not sufficiently tow-towing to whatever it is they want.

By and large, the violence comes from Muslims — attacks from Other onto the Whites. 

When it is Black on Black (Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore), or Latino on Latino or Black/Latino violence it is about turf, money, drugs, and street power and, of course, White oppression.  So the “Progressives” ignore all that.

But the Other on White violence is always justified by the apologists for mass mixing and racial immigration because they hate the narrative of Genesis.

How do they think this will work? …

Read More Read More