Browsed by
Category: Philosophy, Language, Theology

How to think about thinking — presuppositions.

Fake News, Hate Speech, and Lawfare

Fake News, Hate Speech, and Lawfare

Fake News, Hate Speech, and Lawfare, and Misinformation and themes extensively covered in Genesis, Jeremiah, John and the book of Acts.  This is a big long, so I divded into two long sections, and then I have three “shorts” to pique your interest.

 

SHORT: Who has demons? Jesus or the Jews?

SHORT: Antisemitism in the Pulpits (we need a lot more of it!). Jesus Christ warned the world.
It’s past time that the Church warn America.

SHORT: It’s OK to be terrified; it’s not OK to remain silent.

LONG VERSION PART 1:

LONG VERSION PART 2:

Fritz Berggren, PhD
Colorado
October 10, 2024 A.D.

Globalism and Epistemology

Globalism and Epistemology

Thoughts on globalism and why the Church must fight against it.
Epistemology — how do we know what what think we know?
Language and literature as the structure within which we think.
Scripture as written works, whether the Economist, WSJ, or the Bible.

The “Enlightenment” as a Death Cult

The “Enlightenment” as a Death Cult

The greatest contemporary Christian delusion is that there is a third path — a morally and religiously neutral avenue for national growth and health. Eve’s deception on a personal level is no less a delusion on the national/social level.

Jesus Christ — the Rose of Sharon

A nation will either follow Jesus Christ, or it will serve the spirit of the Anti-Christ. America and ancient Israel are examples of this. We were once a Christian nation and now we exalt rebellion against Jesus Christ and His Law. Worse, the church is silent on this matter, thinking the affairs of this world are none one God’s business.

Religious neutrality is a delusion by which one categorizes atheism as “non-religious” when it is a moral and epistemological belief system none-the-less.

For example, the radical imposition of Enlightenment/Atheistic thought eventually yields a demand to accept homosexuality as morally equal with heterosexuality ignoring the “scientific” fact that homosexual couplings cannot produce life. Ditto abominations to change a male into female — no surgery or drug can change and XY into an XX; such measures yield sterility — death in one generation.

Social atheism is a death cult. The Enlightenment yields sterility, disease, poverty, ignorance, human trafficking and slavery (debt slavery is no less slavery that chattel slavery). The run we’ve had in Europe since the birth of the Enlightenment entirely rested on the residual momentum of a Christian people. But Europe was hijacked by Satan’s children. Now that the reservoir of Christ has run dry in these White nations, only Satanism (the delusion of a Third Path) is left.

The Almighty laughs at the arrogance of the “enlightened” thinker and weeps for a church that has accepted the delusion of a third path. There is none.

Either we will have Christian nations explicitly so, elevating the Ten Commandments to the pinnacle for social law and customs — or we will outlaw those who advocate such positions while mutilating children in the name of liberty/Satanism.

Fritz Berggren, PHD
www.bloodandfaith.com
Colorado
7 March 2024

(PS: The First Commandment Points directly to Jesus Christ, not some vague God that could be Allah or Buddha, or Gaia, or Lucifer. It was his Jesus Christ that spoke face to face with Moses as a man speaks to his friend,[1] and it is was the Spirit of Christ[2] that spoke through the prophets of old).


[1] Exodus 33:11 and John 14:9
[2] 1 Peter 1:11

2 Thessalonians

2 Thessalonians

  • To whom are the Epistle’s sent? Europeans.
  • For whom is peace prayed? Not that dusty city.
  • What is the proof of our Christianity? Suffering for His Name’s sake.
  • What is the great delusion? Listen and find out.
  • Who is this man of Lawlessness? Coming or Present?

Fritz Berggren, PHD
www.bloodandfaith.com

Professors as Priests and Prophets

Professors as Priests and Prophets

  • Fritz Berggren talks about his PhD program and how it illuminated the presuppositions of the university systems and how this actually validates the Logos of God.
  • Universities as religious instutitions, cults.  Professors as those who “profess” what they believe — they are the high priests and prophets of this arrogant cult.
  • Universities including Yale and Harvard were founded to train ministers of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.  Over time, the adopted the “traditions of men” as their underlying belief and abandoned Holy Scripture.
  • How the Church today is going the way of the Jews — abandoing what is written for a set of oral “traditions” they impose over the Word of God.  How the Jews did the same with the Torah, which is now ruled by what the Talmud says.  Reference.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning.  Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.” John 1:1-3

Sleeping With the Enemy

Sleeping With the Enemy

Rhetorical self defense using the tools of white supremacy, namely logic and language.

Are You A White Supremacist?

Are You A White Supremacist?

(The following is designed to help people who are afraid of being called a racist or a “white nationalist,” or “white supremacist.” No one likes to be called “demon possessed,” or “insane” (as Jesus Christ by the Jews).
But no one believes in demons or insanity any more, so they need new accusations, accusation like “racist!” I hope this helps.)

Q: Are you a white supremacist?
A: What is white supremacy?

Q: Do you believe whites are superior?
A: Compared who whom? And in what way?

Q: In any way at all.
A: Then I compare the white race — with all its variations — to any other race and the variations of those races. Reducing this, a “race,” or subset, can be reduced to an individual. If I define race as an absolutely unique genetic composition, then an individual makes up the smallest race. And the question becomes — compared to whom and in what way? Every individual is different, no two individuals are equal. That’s the beauty of mankind — we are not equal. Who would want everyone the same color, talent, height, beauty, IQ, hair style or any other attribute?

Expanding on that, if individuals are different, are not their families different? If the Berggren family is different than the Menendez family, why should that be of concern? Are you opposed to diversity?

And if the race to which the Berggren clan belongs is different than another race, why is that an issue at all? No one cares that the vast majority of the world’s elite basketball players are Black — entirely disproportionate to the American populace — is this black supremacy in action? Should you denounce it? If not, why not?

Q: You are avoiding the question.
A: Not at all — you are refusing to define the question. What is race?

Q: Race is a social construct.
A: And what, exactly, does that mean?

Q: Race is not real, it is just a social construction to impose power on others.
A: You mean, like Affirmative Action, and the ethnic categories measured by the U.S. Government? Are you suggesting that Affirmative Action is racist? Or that counting ethnic categories — black, white, hispanic, Native American and so on — is inherently racist? Are you arguing that they should be abolished?

Q: You are avoiding the question — is the white race superior?
A: In what respects? And compared who whom? If you look at European architecture over that last 2500 years, from the Parthenon, to Notre Dame, to English Cathedrals, and compare that the sub-Saharan African architecture over the same millennia, I certainly think European architecture was superior — and I have a right to that opinion. If that is “racist,” well, oh well.

Q: Follow up — do you believe in white nationalism?
A: What is white? What is a nation? The media and academia have made “white nationalism” into a boogie-man that one never finds with any other kind of nationalism including Jewish nationalism, Latino nationalism (Aztlan), Japanese or Arab nationalism or Chinese nationalism. I support nationalist movements in all these groups, and that has been US policy since the end of the First World War. Every nation needs its own land, borders, language, culture and identity. Are you opposed to Palestinian nationalism? Are you opposed to the ethno-state of Israel? Do you oppose the immigration policies of Israel? Should Israel be forced to accept mass immigration from Palestinians and Afghanis and Iraqis and Somalians?

Q: So you oppose immigration of different peoples?
A: Yes, in the same way I oppose immigration of different peoples into my own house and on my own property. I am “xeno-phobic,” as you might say, with respect to an invasion of people who are not my immediate family to come and live with me, even thought they (whoever they are) may be on the street or “underprivileged.” No apologies for this. And that extends to the national level as well.

Q: Some would argue that is “racist.”
A: Would you? Is your home open to the latest Somalian refugees? I would hope not, and I would hope you are mature enough to reject the moral beatings you will receive from the hypocrites who will call you “racist” and yet still never open their own homes to others.

Q: Do you oppose racism?
A: What is racism? Racism is a social construct used to impose guilt upon the white race in order to control them with cudgels of shame. In practice, this charge is only applied to the white race.  I utterly reject the term “racism” as concept in itself. Do you know why “racism” is not illegal? Because it cannot be defined with any precision; and should precision come into play, then it would be applied equally to all races — but that would be inconvenient, wouldn’t it? To call Jews “racists” because they exclude non-Jews from immigration. Or a black murdering a white would be expected to receive the same punishment as white murdering a black — but that is not the case today.

Q: So you are a xenophobic racist, and an antisemitic white nationalist.
A: Cudgels of guilt and shame which I refuse — they don’t work. My rejection of guilt fuels the rage — they cannot control me. We should really have a conversation on the antisemitism trope. Perhaps you can ask me questions about that as well.

(to be continued)

Judas Iscariot

Judas Iscariot

About Judas Iscariot and betrayal. J.I. is a key figure, not just in the story of the ”life of Jesus,” but of Christian theology and man’s relationship with God. Betrayal is common.