Blood and Faith

It perturbs the secular mind to have a ideology (besides their own) that can justify violence.   Their view of “religion” is that is ought remain passive and open to the advances of secular influence.   As in, “religion is a private matter,” a “matter of faith and conscience.”  Unless a Christian conscience opposes something like homosexuality or abortion and then the Christian is told “not to impose” their “religious” beliefs on others.   So much for toleration — it has always been a one way street.

But the subject is violence.  When might a Christian kill?

Of course a man ought resort to violence in order to defend his wife and children (and himself) from death or severe bodily harm.  Those men who have abnegated this role to the police are very trusting — sometimes it works out.  But mostly the murders take the initiative and by the time the police are called the crime is done, a child or wife destroyed, and an “investigation” may be started.  Once in while they actually catch a criminal, assuming he is fairly low on the social pecking order.

Who is not low on the social order?  Armies, police, cartels, gangs, and hired guns.  These folks almost never see judicial repercussions for killing — it is a “protected” sort of killing for police and the military.  And an unacknowledged practice for other professional practitioners of violence. It  could “businessmen” who compete by killing those who get in their way.  And woe to a policeman who dares challenge their power.

In Mexico most killings are not even investigated.  Do you think communities there have an interest in protecting themselves?  In one town the police were disbanded because they all worked for the Cartel.  So calling 911 is never and option for them.  Imagine that poor trusting Mormon family that was slaughtered.   No one was going to come to their aid.  They trusted and died.

Continue reading →

Ragnar Redbeard wrote a book called “Might Makes Right” and I could not agree more with that idea.   He who is strongest makes the rules.  And of course that Strong Man is the Lord I serve.

I have written elsewhere that God is not God because God is good, but rather God is good because God is God.  Might Makes Right is simply a corollary of that.   And this ties directly into the legitimacy of violence.  God does not meet some external standard of “goodness,” God sheds goodness and rightness like we shed hair and dry skin.  What is good is a byproduct of Him — Goodness and Rightness  are derivatives of Him, not some universal external (to God) standard.

I wonder at those who interest themselves in asking Christians whether or not they eschew violence.  Because (they imply), a Christian would never impose his will by force.  (As if God would not impose His will by force — of course He will!)

Governments and politicians with police, soldiers, and an industrial scale prison system  rule by, with, and through violence.  For them to ask a somone — “do you eschew violence?” is the cougar asking the bunny if it promises to never defend itself.  

Politicians covet armed guards as symbols of rank  and the might to remain in power.    No President or Congressman that I know of has ever asked their  body-guards  to disarm and stand down.  When they ask citizens to disarm, they seek subjects to rule, not citizens to represent.

Those politicians are not against violence —  they seek their own monopoly of violence — their goal is absolute power through  which they alone define what is “right.” 

Might makes right. Continue reading →

This whole concept of “racism” is a set up by the Great Accuser to accuse Jesus Christ of the greatest sin in history — “racism!”

I am trying to undermine the whole concept of “racism.”
I reject the entire presupposition underlying “don’t be racist.”
I laugh at those who try to earn a merit badge that says, “I’m not a racist.”

Anyone who tries to justify himself by saying “I’m not a racist” has already ceded the argument — this very statement presumes  “I agree that racism is the moral standard.”   If you say this about yourself, you’ve already enslaved yourself to a false narrative.

Free men need to liberate themselves from guilt manipulation — everything  can be boiled down to “racism” by the accusers when they don’t like something.  That is slavery.   This is important on its own for a free people, but it isn’t even the most important thing.

Here is the bigger point: Salvation is based on blood line.

Continue reading →

The stark failure of economic Marxism— classical Marxism — in the Soviet Union and China is universally recognized.   There just aren’t many classical Marxists left who want a society that looks like the old USSR nor China under Mao — it just didn’t work.

People woke up.  Nobody that is productive wants to share their wealth with the unproductive. And if they are forced to, history proves that they join the unproductive and nothing works at all.   

The abolition of private property is against human nature and that is OK.

  It used to be, in the earlier days of the USSR, that anyone whispering such heresy would be hauled off to a re-education center to rot for a few years.  They would be stripped of privileges (everything is a privilege in a totalitarian society, even the right to eat and breathe), lose their job, education, home, children and off they would go as someone truly the enemy of humanity, deplorable people, non-citizens.

Flag of London

In 2019 the totalitarian impulse strives not for forced sharing of property, rather it is a forced belief that “we are all equal,” and “diversity is good,” and “we must integrate.”  And a lot of people, perhaps most, don’t even question this, just like most Russians didn’t question Marxism in 1950. For to question is to become a heretic, a deplorable, a non-citizen and to risk assault and the loss of ones education and livelihood.

Yet this moral demand for integration/diversity is as unnatural and unsustainable as the demand for the abolition of private property.  It is truly inhuman.

So let me confess my sins, Comrade. Continue reading →

When I came of voting age I voted for Ronald Reagan. Later I voted for Bill Clinton.  After that I realized both parties campaigned one way and ruled another.  I dabbled in Libertarian ideology and voted for Ron Paul.  None of this, of course, made any difference and our country slid constantly toward the precipice.   

I was enamored, for a while, with the idea of a system safe for all — accepting the various beliefs, and perhaps moralities, of everyone, while creating a solid structure for all.

The course of our country forced me to think deeply about this; and I concluded that it wasn’t possible.  And I was forced to think mostly deeply on what is most important — an earthly order to accommodate us all (not an ignoble goal), or was there something deeper.  

I was forced to the foundations of my life. If God be God, then all the earth should obey him.  And I gave up the idea of a “neutral” structure in which we could all get along.  I do not believe that is possible, although at one time I spent some effort thinking about how to make this work.

Once having resolved that, I have pursued thinking about how to create a new nation states that serve the King, Jesus Christ.

Nations are bloodlines — they are the natural God ordained social order.
A family (Man and wife and children) are the foundation of a bloodline.
Extend that bloodline and you have clan, tribe and nation. Kith and Kin. Continue reading →

Debt is the enjoyment of pleasure now for the payment, plus interest, later.

Wealth is the denial of indulgence now for the abundance of savings later, plus interest.

Hedonism is the enjoyment of life’s carnal pleasures now.

Fidelity is the denial of one’s flesh for the honor of raising children and grandchildren who are loyal (faithful; from fidelity) to one’s God.

The Western economy is built on debt.
Debt Capitalism.

Capitalism today is founded on debt and the creation on money from nothing. 

At the end of the day, the banking system in the United States, and the western world, is built on a monopolistic fractional reserve debt capitalism that rewards the few who  lend at interest money (that they do not own) and punish those who borrow money to live (the 99%).  

This system rewards hedonists and punishes the faithful.  

“Free enterprise” by no means includes the US banking system. Continue reading →

True North

There has to be arrows pointing true north.
People can be lost.
People can choose to be lost.
People can choose to go their own way.
But there has to be arrows pointing true north.

True North can only be pointed out by a people who know the Hebrew and Greek writings, the Bible, and are willing to be seen and noticed. 

Wandering souls cry out for true north in their hearts.
Who will tell them where it is?

Christians are the only arrows that can people which way North lies.

The lost will may follow the right direction if they are shown it.
They may repent and follow the narrow path.
Or they may decide they really didn’t want to know true north after all.

Christians will be judged on whether or not we offered that Arrow.
Or whether it was too much trouble to tell them they were off track.

This blog is dedicated to True North as far as I know it. 

Fritz Berggren, PhD
The Ides of October Anno Domini 2019

It’s a funny title, right? I mean, who would even bring that subject up?  Normies are terrified of the most remote association with white nationalism, or white separatism, which translates into the unforgivable sin, the Scarlett Letter of the Twenty-First Century.  It is worse — much worse — that being a child molester (I don’t see Hillary Clinton or Mitt Romney shedding any crocodile tears about Eptein’s crimes against children).

But these things need to be thought about.

 It is completely unnatural and a-historic to mix bloodlines (races) and then to expect universal harmony and joy. On the contrary, the mixing of races has always been a project of either conquest, or control.   The ancient world had no problem extinguishing bloodlines or mixing bloodlines such that nationalities (which are bloodlines) are forced to fight each other for survival instead of using their strength to resist a distant tyrant.   And once the tyrant is kicked over, the bloodlust brewing for centuries is unleashed an murder and mayhem take over.  Completing the circle, and new tyrant takes over and enforces order by their own violence.  Consider the fate of Yugoslavia over the last thirty years and you get the idea.   The nations broke apart and started the melee.  An external Force imposed “peace” through a campaign of aerial bombardment upon peoples of no relation to them whatsoever.

You and I have neighbors.  Me, and mine, live in my home. We have fences that are respected.  My neighbor is free to knock on my door and say hello and even ask for a favor, a cup of sugar, or whatever it is. And the better we get a long, the more likely I am to render assistance.  But that neighbor has no right to enter my home. He has no right to stand up on my lawn or even walk up my driveway.   He has no right to sit on my couch nor speak arrogantly toward me or my family when he is in my home. Continue reading →

There is a project to force the integration of bloodlines.  This is Blacks.  Asians. Mexicans.  Europeans.  So-Called “Indigenous” peoples.  Forced integration into Europe and North America.  (But racial purification in Southern Africa — exterminating the Whites — seems to be ignored. Ironic how hypocritical this is.)

The theory of the Liberal Progressive Westerners is that we all must learn to be tolerant and get along and that the “bad” people aren’t the backward uneducated non-Whites (this is implied in their argument), rather the White’s themselves, because upon whom else will they ply their guilt manipulation? Certainly not the oppressed non-whites!

And so when they come, by the millions, and they drive over people, and shoot people, and knife people, and bomb people, and rape white boys and girls, and cut the clitoris off of young girls — it becomes the White’s problem (in their mind) for not sufficiently tow-towing to whatever it is they want.

By and large, the violence comes from Muslims — attacks from Other onto the Whites. 

When it is Black on Black (Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore), or Latino on Latino or Black/Latino violence it is about turf, money, drugs, and street power and, of course, White oppression.  So the “Progressives” ignore all that.

But the Other on White violence is always justified by the apologists for mass mixing and racial immigration because they hate the narrative of Genesis.

How do they think this will work? Continue reading →

(I did not write this. But I wish I did.)

“If the European people were one with their progenitors, they would not be the confused, cowardly creatures they now are. They are confused because they think they can actually be part of Liberaldom if they voice their disagreement with certain aspects of liberalism in polite terms. And as the mad-dog liberals become crueler, divesting themselves of all humanity, the grazers and the ‘conservatives’ become more polite and self-effacing. But I ask you, was Robespierre gentle to the people who were civil to him? Did civility and politeness make Stalin feel warm and gushy so that he stopped killing millions? Civility should be the byword when Christians meet to discuss how best to advance His reign of charity, it should not be the byword — in fact it should have no place at all — when we confront liberals whose stated goal is the elimination of all things white and Christian.”

From Cambria Will Not Yield.