Defining the Conflict: Follow Up

Defining the Conflict: Follow Up

Jesus Christ v. AntiChrist

Framing the conflict as Jesus Christ versus the forces of the AntiChrist is the most effective way of describing our current situation, and the only narrative that will recruit hundreds of millions of “believers” into the fight.

Let’s be honest: 90% of “Christians,” including Pastors, ignore the current conflict. And while there is a huge overlap in Christians and Patriots (Right, Conservative, Traditionalist), they don’t perceive the conflict in terms of loyalty to our Monarch Jesus Christ. They are Patriots who happen to be Christians as well.

Our current distress should be about Christians creating nations, societies and states that are explicitly loyal to a distant Sovereign eagerly awaiting his return. If Charles III, King of the British Empire, can reign over distant New Zealand from old England, then Christians should no less swear fealty to our Sovereign King Jesus Christ, believe in Him no less, and prepare the way for our Lord no less than John the Baptist preparing the way for the Incarnation.

This conflict IS about loyal servants of Jesus Christ establishing of Christian Nation/States.  Bringing discipline to the nations IS the Great Commission.  The problem is that the Church doesn’t perceive it this way.

If we fight to roll back fifty years, or a hundred and fifty years, we will ultimately fail because “conservatism” or “traditional values” is a house built on sand. Without the Rock of the Word of God, a “conservative” society will fall (as we have watched the United States, and all of Christendom fall) because it eschewed the foundation of the Word of God — Jesus Christ.

If, on the other hand, the Church wakes up (and it is very much asleep as it waits to fly away in a “rapture”) then we will rebuild Christendom, making every valley a plain and every mountain low for the Rulership of our Monarch Jesus Christ.  This is nothing less than our duty as Christians.

Defining the Conflict

Defining the Conflict

  • New language that replaces the inadequate description of Right v. Left, Conservative v. Liberal, Tradition Values v. Progressive.
  • This is AntiChrist versus Jesus Christ.
  • Seeking Christians to fight.
  • Hell will be full of the cowardly and unbelieving.
  • Revelation 21:8

Christian Reconstruction — Foundations for Christian Nations

Christian Reconstruction — Foundations for Christian Nations

A few decades ago there were heathen muttering against “Christian Reconstruction,” which was simply another way of saying “Jesus Christ is the God-Emperor of Earth and His Word is the final say on all matters forever.”   Christian’s were upset. Pastor’s were upset. Much ink was spilled renouncing what cannot be renounced (that the Word of God is Supreme over all creation).

I was fortunate to attend a series of of conferences on Christian Reconstruction in the Seattle area and met Rousas Rushdoony, Gary North, Otto Scott. I read Gary Demar, the “Red Books” (Christian History of the Constitution) and, my favorite, Greg Bahnsen’s Theonomy in Christian Ethics.

I heartedly endorse their work and legacy, hope this angers the AntiChrists, and encourage my readers to indulge in the riches they offer us.

This morning I was remind to turn to them for wisdom on Biblical economics, specifically warnings against a debt-based (usurious) economic systems that essentially enslave the masses and enriches a very few mammon-worshippers.  Any “Christian Nation” must address the fundamentals of money, banking and interest.  I am no expert at any of these, but I don’t need to be when they have offered up much better wisdom that I can bring to the table.

Bottom line, fiat currency is massive theft from the poor via inflation. That, coupled with endless mortgages and debt, are a system of slavery by any other name. It has to be addressed, abolished, and replaced by sound money, a sabbath on debts, jubillees, and rebuilding of cohesive groups (nations) that corporately worship Jesus Christ via their culture, language, geography, descendants and history.

Good morning,

Fritz Berggren, PhD
Colorado
22 October 2022

  • Ex 22:25 “If you lend money to any of My people who are poor among you, you shall not be like a moneylender to him; you shall not charge him interest.
  • Deuteronomy 23:19 “You shall not charge interest to your brother—interest on money or food or anything that is lent out at interest.
  • Leviticus 25:36 Take no usury or interest from him; but fear your God, that your brother may live with you.
  • Proverbs 22:7 The wealthy rule over the poor, and anyone who borrows is a slave to the lender.
  • Psalm 15
    Lord, who may [a]abide in Your tabernacle?
    Who may dwell in Your holy hill?
    He who walks uprightly,
    And works righteousness,
    And speaks the truth in his heart;
    He who does not backbite with his tongue,
    Nor does evil to his neighbor,
    Nor does he [b]take up a reproach against his friend;
    In whose eyes a vile person is despised,
    But he honors those who fear the Lord;
    He who swears to his own hurt and does not change;
    He who does not put out his money at usury,
    Nor does he take a bribe against the innocent.
    He who does these things shall never be moved.

A few links:

 

 

 

Video: Converting Nations to the Monarch Jesus Christ

Video: Converting Nations to the Monarch Jesus Christ

 

The church has a two fold mission: converting souls and ALSO converting nations. They go hand in hand and the success of one depends upon the success of the other. For too long the church has surrender the conversion of nations and as a result the conversion of souls is weak.

Part 2: Race Nationalism? Or Religious Nationalism?

Part 2: Race Nationalism? Or Religious Nationalism?

Part 2: Racial or Religious Nationalism?

Adam’s physical body was created from the dust of the ground. Then, the breath of life was given to him.  A nation was formed in history — a bloodline — from Jacob/Israel.  Then, when it was ready (and only then),  that specific bloodline made the chosen race and the chosen people.

No man can get “born again” and converted to Jesus Christ unless first he is born of water — born of a woman. Only then can he be born again of the Spirit.  These cannot be inverted — the body of flesh holds within it the Spirit of God. This is true for the individual as well as for the Nation.

There is no such thing as a disembodied Christian and there is no such thing as a disembodied Christian nation.  It is Satan’s project to destroy bloodlines and mix genders and kinds. It was God’s project to end the mixing and establish distinctive races/bloodlines in order to see which bloodline(s) would corporately serve Jesus Christ. Likewise, God created individuals to see whom would be loyalty to Jesus Christ in this life. But those individuals must exist in the flesh before they can be converted in the Spirit.

It is not possible for a Christian soul to exist without a physical body coming first.

It is not possible for a Christian nation to exist without a corporate body — a bloodline united by history, language and geography.

It is Satan’s project — the AntiChrist — to atomize humans and reduce him to powerlessness.  The project to eliminate bloodlines/nations is the project to rebuild Babel — Babel 2.0.   This voracious enemy of mankind atomizes both male and female, rendering them null; not being satisfied with that he then seeks physical dismemberment of male and female in today’s “transitioning” movement. This is Satanism in practice every bit as much as the project to eliminate nations is Satanism.

If you want to preserve the goodness of what God created — male and female — then one ought also fight to preserve the different nations and bloodlines which His Hand caused to come out of Babel in the division of the earth.  The blending of male and female (transgenderism and homosexuality) is but a continuation of the project to blend and destroy.  Both are projects of the AntiChrist.

Ancient Israel was a race/bloodline created by God and it was placed in a distinct geography with defined borders. Within that nation/state were distinct tribes with distinct borders.  Ancient Israel was to be a role model for every other nation on earth.

It is Christian duty to resist amalgamation and support distinct organic nations/bloodlines.

Observe the hypocrisy of a mighty empire who fosters racial discord at home and yet supports racial nationalism abroad: Yugoslavia was divided into distinct nations, Sudan was divided into northern and southern Sudan and there is “two state solution” for Palestine.

I once spoke to a “British” expat and he corrected me: “I am not British — I am English.”  And to that I replied “I am so happy to hear that.” Welsh nationalism, Scottish independence, the English Defense League and Irish nationalism are forces resisting the Borg (Babel 2.0). It is Christian duty to oppose the Borg of Babel 2.0. Catalonia secession and the yearning of the Quebecois for a national identity are good things.  The independence of Taiwan and the secession of Bangladesh and Pakistan from India are acts of resistance toward Babylon the Great. Amalgamation is an enemy of mankind.

Once in the land to our north, we met as two hundred senior bureaucrats and defense officials for a capstone-type seminar — preparing us for leadership and setting the direction of a national project. One speaker was African born and raised, transplanted to Canada then given a Canadian passport. A professor at a prestigious Canadian university, he was asked why so many African countries had a hard time succeeding.  He said plainly that the lines on the map were drawn not based upon racial or national divisions, but willy-nilly in such a manner as to guarantee endless strife between the various tribes and ethnicities which never were “one nation.” (The Professor had not gotten the memo on false nationalism, and no follow up questions were asked.) He named one successful sub-Saharan African nation and attributed its strength to borders coterminous with a solid ethnic group with a shared language, history and values.

I doubt that Professor was invited to return.

Both the story of the Tower of Babel and Daniel 2:43-45 illustrate the falsehood of building empires on something God Himself opposed.

Erasing distinct nations is directly linked to the project of erasing fixed gender identities and the inversion of the Fifth Commandment— all are projects of the AntiChrist who has re-engaged the ancient project of Babel. The Church ought to play no part in this project but should work against Babylon the Great as fervently as they ought to work against the gender blending horror of modern homosexuality and transgenderism — both are equally evil. The Churchman who rejects one while accepting the other is complicit in Satan’s project of Inversion.

The canard of “supremacy” is just that — it is institutional hypocrisy and slander from the Great Accuser who seeks to reestablish Babel.   Likewise, “equality” is a false idol, a lure that Satan tempted Eve with. No two men are equal; no two nations are equal, no two ethnicities are equal.

It is an insult to all parties to say “you are all the same.” Tell a woman that she is “just the same” as every other woman and see how that works out for your relationship — it is insulting. Likewise for men or tribes or races. Let us glory in the differences, not erase them.

Each is called to express the glory of the Creator (Jesus Christ) with the gifts and talents and uniqueness within themselves.

The AntiChrist seeks a disembodied antinationalism with a false God of “democracy” and “universal” human rights as a replacement for the organic, for the blood and for geography. A disembodied Christian Nation with no organic ties to blood and soil is a false nation — it refuses to recognize what God himself did at Babel (Genesis 11), and denies Acts 17:26-27 and Daniel 2:43-45.

In pursuit of Christian Nations, a body is required first. Distinct Nations, nations of robust integrity, unlike the nations described in Daniel 2:43-25, are required. And then let those distinct nations swear allegiance to their King Jesus Christ.

In Blood and Faith,

Fritz Berggren, PhD
Colorado
16 October 2022 A.D.

Notes on Leviticus

Notes on Leviticus

  • An overview of the book of Leviticus.
    The detail of blood sacrifice, the volume of blood sacrifice, and the attention to sins intentional or unintentional. Clean and unclean animals.
  • Noah’s wife, Ham, Canaan and uncovering your father’s nakedness.
  • Consequences of sin is death and the necessity of doing this exactly the right way or face judgment.
  • Hebrews 10.

 

Race Nationalism? Or Religious Nationalism?

Race Nationalism? Or Religious Nationalism?

White Nationalism or Christian Nationalism?
Race based nationalism or religion-based nationalism?

So which is first? Race-based nationalism or faith-based nationalism? Also, we need to discuss the question of White Nationalism versus, say, Black Nationalism or Native America Nationalism or Arab Nationalisms or Palestinian Nationalism or Jewish Nationalism. If White Nationalism is evil, why are the other Nationalism considered Good?

They (the haters of Whites) will weave their hatred in attempts to justify the extinction of the White race; that is the systemic and institutional hypocrisy that Jesus Christ warned against when he attacked the Pharisees. “Jews” can herald their own race as special and worthy of a race-based geographic space and privileges while denying similar claims to other races (whether to Arabs or Europeans). That is the institutional hypocrisy that Jesus railed against.

The theological case for race-based nationalism is in Genesis 11: the story of the Tower of Babel.  When Noah left the Ark, God commanded them to spread out across the face of the earth and multiply in it. Man — rebellious man — refused and consolidated power at Babel. So heinous was this rebellion that Jesus Christ (pre-Incarnation) intervened at Babel and divided mankind based upon Race (ethnicity/nation/bloodline). This division was reinforced by introducing the original gift of diverse tongues. Men ceased being able to communicate with each other and began migrating away from each other.

Read More Read More

Part 3: The False Bride

Part 3: The False Bride

Part 3 of the False Bride.  Jesus Christ warns His people, the Church, of sliding into the same sin of the Talmud followers: elevating their own man made traditions over the Word of God.  And the evangelical church has done just that — distanced themselves from the Word of God in order to stay in the good graces of the antichrist.   This has been predictable for two thousand years — Christ repeatedly warned about it.

False Bride: Part 1 and Part 2

False Bride: Part 1 and Part 2

Parts 1 and 2 — both should be listened to in sequence.

If ancient Israel and Judah became harlots, then why not the evangelical Church? As evangelicals paper over the words of Jesus Christ with their man-made traditions and precepts (which is was the Talmud people did to the Law and the prophets) they also become part of that Great Whore, that Prostitute, that False Bride. The evangelical church is more fearful of the antichrist than Jesus Christ.

The story of Satan’s seduction of his own bride, a false wife, the Great Whore. From Eve to Genesis 6 to Jeremiah 2 to Ezekiel 16 to the Revelation. It’s hidden in plain sight for those with eyes to see and ears to hear.