Browsed by
Tag: Romans 11

“Jew” Does Not Equal the Israel of Romans 11

“Jew” Does Not Equal the Israel of Romans 11

Comments 0 Comment

Here’s a response I wrote to a reader struggling to understand Romans 11 and the promise of the redeption to Israel.
(The reader equated modern Jews with Israel).

Since this is a common misconception I’m passing on my response here:

“You are asking the right questions.

I wrote a whole book answering them, so I’ll be brief (Heres is the book: Buy this book:https://a.co/d/bJWfn2H)

The Jews would confuse us to believe that anyone calling themselves a “Jew” is the same is the biological children of Jacob (the House of Israel). This is biblically, and historically false. Esther 8:17 — many different ethnic groups become Jews. Jesus Christ endores this view in Matthew 23:15 — the Jews made proselytes. The vast majority of European Jews are descendants of Khazars. Even the name “Askenazik Jew” shows they are from Japheth — they are not even Semities.

  • — “Israel” is not that dirt over there. The “Israel” of Romans is the biological descendatns of Jacob, most of whom migrated to Europe and converted (past tense) to Jesus Christ as Europe became Christendom (the Kingdom of Christ).
  • — The Gospel was designed for Europe — The New Testament was written in Greek — the premier European Tongue.
  • — There is no Epistle to Jerusalem or the land around it.
  • — There is no prayer for the peace of that city over there (Jerusalem) in the New Testament but every Epistles has a prayer for the peace of the Church (those of us in Christ) or for individual Christians.
  • — The new Testament is entire hostile to “Jews,” which is not same as the House of Israel. The Jpost has a great article on that in 2019: “Is the New Testament Antisemtic?”
  • — The House of Israel (the biological offspring of the man called Jacob) migrated to Europe (John 7:35).
  • — The term “Jew” only starts to be used (in the Bible) deep iinto the apostasy of the southern two tribes (Judah, collectively). At that point they had already started murdering the prophets (1 Thes 2:15). The Ten Northern tribes (ISrael) had already gone into exile into Assyria (and from there to Europe) and those tribes NEVER referred to themselves as Jews.

And there is so much more. Buy this book:https://a.co/d/bJWfn2H

Romans 11

Romans 11

Comments 0 Comment

Question from a reader: “Hey Fritz, what is your interpretation of Romans 11? I’m currently trying to figure out what God means by saving all Israel and grafting them back in. It seems the mystery is to heal the blindness of the people of Israel in the last days.”

Answer: This is a great question and one I look forward to writing about. Of course, this could take a book in itself, but I’ll be brief.

First, start this by reading from Romans 9.  I’m very happy to say that Paul sets a precedent for the love of one’s own race.  For him they were his “brethren . . . kinsmen according to the flesh,” Israelites. (Romans 9:1-3)  He would rather be eternally damned if it meant salvation for his own race.  He repeats this in Romans 10:1.

And for this I say the same thing for the Whites, the Europeans — I would gladly give my eternal soul for their salvation, for they are my kinsmen according to the flesh for whom the Gospel was designed — it was to the Europeans that the care of the Vineyard went (Matthew 21:43).  

Who is Israel?  Here are four answers to that: …

Read More Read More

The Chosen People

The Chosen People

Comments 0 Comment

The Jews are not “God’s chosen people.”  Some Christians criticize this position and rail against  “Replacement Theology” as some kind of heresy.  In fact, “replacement theology” is as legitimate as the replacement of Judas Iscariot with Matthias.   

Judas Iscariot was replaced. Another man filled his ministry. His ministry and calling did not go away, but Judas  did.  Someone filled that gap.  Judas is a type of the Jew, starting with his name, Judas, and linked to his town, Iscariot/Kerioth, located in the land of Judea.  

Jesus Christ (God) himself called Judas Iscariot to the ministry — it was Judas’ calling and purpose.  Jesus did not make a mistake when he called Judas.   Never-the-less, Judas turned aside and went his own way and the disciples understood that he had to be replaced.  So Matthias stepped into his ministry and took his place.   Judas was replaced.

Gods intent to replace the ancient Nation of Israel was clear from its very inception — God himself told Moses to stand aside so he could wipe them out and start a new nation afresh from Moses.   This replacement would be fulfilled in Jesus Christ —  who was the fulfillment of both Moses (who willed to be sacrificed for His people),  and from Him (Jesus), from which a new race would be born. That ancient nation was a stiff-necked and hard hearted people who always were resisting the Holy Spirit.  Stephen encapsulates this in Acts 7 when he reminds them that they rejected both Joseph and Moses as well as killed the prophets and became the murders of the Righteous One.  

Jesus Christ told the Jews that they would be replaced.  He told Jerusalem that your house would be left desolate and cursed the fig tree (a type of Israel) with eternal barrenness.  And in the parable of the wedding feast, those invited refused to come, and God replaced them with other guests. …

Read More Read More