God is not God because God is good — God is good because God is God.
God sheds goodness — his legitimacy does not originate from anything or any standard other than Himself.
And He is the only person who stands in that position — God is The Supreme Monarch — the Dictator Tyrant of the Universe, both of the seen and the unseen.
Fritz Berggren, PhD
(I originally wrote this in August 2017).
I think this summer [August 2017] will be remembered as the start of the second US Civil War.
Sounds melodramatic. But that’s what I think.
Hard to say how it will unfold. Do we get distracted by another foreign war and rally around the flag? I don’t think so.
I think the Left has gone to far. They are Marxists. Zero loyalty to our history or constitution and they hate the White Man and all he stands for. Time to stop pussy-footing around on this and just say it.
And the whiter a person is, the more shrill they become in order to signal their virtue on overcoming their privilege. Don’t they realize how weak that really makes them?
And our spineless so-called conservative lawmakers (in the GOP) are scared to death to defy the Left for fear of being branded with a scarlet “R” on their forehead.
Not to mention most of the bureaucracy.
Colorado Springs is pretty conservative, at least compared to DC. Still, they ran one group out of town here, for being white, basically. Obama’s old church and Louis Farrakahn and BLM and Occupy and Anti-Fa . . . aren’t they “hate groups?” No. Why? Because Obama approves, the Democrats approved, and they are blessed by our press, universities, and the Southern Poverty Law Center.
My position is that there is no point at which the Left will be happy.
Aside from the family, schools are the most important social structure in a nation. Everything important (to that society) is written into their hearts and minds at the school. Thus we must focus on this.
Since the school is an extension of the family — since the “government” is not the owner of our children — the family must control the eduction of the children. Specifically, the father must decide and direct educational priorities even if he delegates the tutoring to others.
None of this happens today. …
]There is an overlooked enemy in this war against Christianity. It is not the Democrats. It is not the Republicans, who are more Left wing today than the Democrats were in the 1980s. It’s not Soros. It’s not the Illuminati. It’s not the illegal aliens. It’s not the homosexuals or even antics.
It is a group of self-selecting and powerful cult leaders. Their influence is unspeakably enormous — all the more so because their influence is rarely discussed. It is so all pervading that we don’t even realize it is there. They are the heads of a religion — a religion that hates Jesus Christ. 
They don’t believe they are religious; in fact, one of the tenets of their religion is that they are not religious. The bedrock of their faith is that they don’t have any faith. They do, but they convince themselves and their cult followers that they are above all appeals to faith or belief. They just KNOW, and are above questioning. For to question them is to be a heretic, a foolish and ignorant know-nothing fit for mockery and ridicule.
Like Priests in every religion, they don’t do real work. They live quite nicely off of a mandatory religious tax — a tithe by any other name. They are accountable to nobody but “truth,” and since they define what is true (which is the role of priests and prophets) they are above criticism.
They are the gate-keepers to society. No one can hold a job of any importance unless they have journeyed through years of religious indoctrination under their discipleship.
Like any true religion, they don’t see themselves as religions — they are just explaining all of reality as it really is.
Of course that is exactly what I do in my writings. I’m not a religious person. I don’t believe in religion. I seek on Truth. And that Truth lies in the Creator and I have taken my cues from the literary corpus inspired by Spirit of Truth. I just say what is.
And they feel the same way. They would scoff at the idea that they are religious leaders.
We have not wrapped our heads around the idea that they so thoroughly control our thoughts, words, and deed. They spoon feed us the very knowledge we think we possess.
Who are those people? …
Race War. This is something White Americans are horrified to talk about. Because to contemplate a race war is to admit that racial differences are a fundamental component of human identity.
To self-identify as a White — which I did not do until my later middle age — is a revolutionary act. Whites are terrified of identifying as White. Because to do is is to reject their own secular religion that says ‘we are all one.’
Only Whites are told they cannot have a racial identity — because if they have a racial identity they are called “racists.”
The propaganda machine in the United States — from the public schools to the press oligarchy — have convinced most Americans that off all the sins in the world, “racism” is the unforgivable sin. And that the only people who can be “racists” are Whites; and that a White cannot ever free himself from the guilt of racism.
Whites must reject this guilt manipulation and must do what every other racial group in America has been told to do: Accept who they are, be proud and work together to strengthen their position.
It was Thanksgiving yesterday and we had a quiet dinner at home, just the four of us. Our two older children are on their own nowadays and so things are less rambunctious than a decade ago.
Somehow our conversation got around to talking about God, which isn’t a surprise in our Christian family, especially since I have a passionate interest in the truly deep questions.
And so I started talking about the Judgement Day. You stand alone before your Maker and give account for your life. Pretty scary stuff — at least is for me when I think of my own mortality and shortcomings. I think it is natural to focus on that.
The Judgement Day really isn’t mysterious. No one will show up and say “gee whiz, God, I wished someone would have told me what I was going to be judged on.”
Everyone knows what they are supposed to do in life.
I’ve been meditating on violence for couple of weeks now, and I observe that violence is like a dance. It has beginning, a middle, and an end. There is a ceremony to it. It requires two parties, at least. More for line dancing. It can be beautiful to behold and also ugly.
Now I’m not talking about the personal application of kinetic force; I don’t know anything about that. That’s not what this series is about. Sure, I can shoot a gun — everyone should have some basics on that just for safety’s sake, just like they should know how to tie a knot, swim, drive a car, and slice a turkey at Thanksgiving.
I’m thinking about violence as a part of the world we live in. Violence is a regular and steady component of every civilization that I am familiar with. I mean, the United States is “that” nation that is constantly at war — we have been at war for more of our history than we have been at peace. Inside the US, there is constant violence ( I’m not just talking street crimes — those hold no interest to me). Armed government workers (policemen) and prisons are fundamental parts of our society; America would not be America without our own domestic standing army of “policemen” and the largest prison system, per capita, on the planet. Those are institutions of violence. We now have more armed federal civilian government workers than the entire U.S. Marine Corps. And this does not include state, county and local law enforcement.
But that’s not what this article is about, either. Others can wax quite elegantly about that.
I want to talk about how the dance starts.
There is a ritual to beginning violence. …
It perturbs the secular mind to have a ideology (besides their own) that can justify violence. Their view of “religion” is that is ought remain passive and open to the advances of secular influence. As in, “religion is a private matter,” a “matter of faith and conscience.” Unless a Christian conscience opposes something like homosexuality or abortion and then the Christian is told “not to impose” their “religious” beliefs on others. So much for toleration — it has always been a one way street.
But the subject is violence. When might a Christian kill?
Of course a man ought resort to violence in order to defend his wife and children (and himself) from death or severe bodily harm. Those men who have abnegated this role to the police are very trusting — sometimes it works out. But mostly the murders take the initiative and by the time the police are called the crime is done, a child or wife destroyed, and an “investigation” may be started. Once in while they actually catch a criminal, assuming he is fairly low on the social pecking order.
Who is not low on the social order? Armies, police, cartels, gangs, and hired guns. These folks almost never see judicial repercussions for killing — it is a “protected” sort of killing for police and the military. And an unacknowledged practice for other professional practitioners of violence. 
It could “businessmen” who compete by killing those who get in their way. And woe to a policeman who dares challenge their power.
In Mexico most killings are not even investigated. Do you think communities there have an interest in protecting themselves? In one town the police were disbanded because they all worked for the Cartel. So calling 911 is never and option for them. Imagine that poor trusting Mormon family that was slaughtered. No one was going to come to their aid. They trusted and died.
Ragnar Redbeard wrote a book called “Might Is Right” and I could not agree more with that idea. He who is strongest makes the rules. And of course that Strong Man is the Lord I serve. One of Jesus’ names is the Captains of the Lord’s Hosts (Armies).
I have written elsewhere that God is not God because God is good, but rather God is good because God is God. Might Makes Right is simply a corollary of that. And this ties directly into the legitimacy of violence. God does not meet some external standard of “goodness,” God sheds goodness and rightness like we shed hair and dry skin. What is good is a byproduct of Him — Goodness and Rightness are derivatives of Him, not some universal external (to God) standard.
I wonder at those who interest themselves in asking Christians whether or not they eschew violence. Because (they imply), a Christian would never impose his will by force. (As if God would not impose His will by force — of course He will!)
Governments and politicians with police, soldiers, and an industrial scale prison system rule by, with, and through violence. For them to ask a somone — “do you eschew violence?” is the cougar asking the bunny if it promises to never defend itself.
Politicians covet armed guards as symbols of rank and the might to remain in power. No President or Congressman that I know of has ever asked their body-guards to disarm and stand down. When they ask citizens to disarm, they seek subjects to rule, not citizens to represent.
Those politicians are not against violence — they seek their own monopoly of violence — their goal is absolute power through which they alone define what is “right.”
Might makes right. …
This whole concept of “racism” is a set up by the Great Accuser to accuse Jesus Christ of the greatest sin in history — “racism!”
I am trying to undermine the whole concept of “racism.”
I reject the entire presupposition underlying “don’t be racist.”
I laugh at those who try to earn a merit badge that says, “I’m not a racist.”
Anyone who tries to justify himself by saying “I’m not a racist” has already ceded the argument — this very statement presumes “I agree that racism is the moral standard.” If you say this about yourself, you’ve already enslaved yourself to a false narrative.
Free men need to liberate themselves from guilt manipulation — everything can be boiled down to “racism” by the accusers when they don’t like something. That is slavery. This is important on its own for a free people, but it isn’t even the most important thing.
Here is the bigger point: Salvation is based on blood line.