Diversity and Reality: the Non-Viability of Forced Integration
The stark failure of economic Marxism— classical Marxism — in the Soviet Union and China is universally recognized. There just aren’t many classical Marxists left who want a society that looks like the old USSR nor China under Mao — it just didn’t work.
People woke up. Nobody that is productive wants to share their wealth with the unproductive. And if they are forced to, history proves that they join the unproductive and nothing works at all.
The abolition of private property is against human nature and that is OK.
It used to be, in the earlier days of the USSR, that anyone whispering such heresy would be hauled off to a re-education center to rot for a few years. They would be stripped of privileges (everything is a privilege in a totalitarian society, even the right to eat and breathe), lose their job, education, home, children and off they would go as someone truly the enemy of humanity, deplorable people, non-citizens.

In 2019 the totalitarian impulse strives not for forced sharing of property, rather it is a forced belief that “we are all equal,” and “diversity is good,” and “we must integrate.” And a lot of people, perhaps most, don’t even question this, just like most Russians didn’t question Marxism in 1950. For to question is to become a heretic, a deplorable, a non-citizen and to risk assault and the loss of ones education and livelihood.
Yet this moral demand for integration/diversity is as unnatural and unsustainable as the demand for the abolition of private property. It is truly inhuman.
So let me confess my sins, Comrade. …






