How do we know what we think we know? This is epistemology.
What lies do we believe? Evolution? Election integrity? Homosexuality? That there is no Truth? That the Vaccine actually works? How can we know?
A discussion of Epistemology. New challenges — did God create light and day and night BEFORE he created the Sun and Moon and Stars? There is a lot of work to do, Church. Go Big or Go Home!
The absurdities they demand you believe and the role of the Church in exploding the cult. Evolution as a lie. Flat earth???? Genesis Chapter One: God creates the earth BEFORE he creates the sun and moon and stars. God creates light and day and night BEFORE he creates the sun. Be proud of our God and defy the Antichrist!
Antichrist intellectuals diabolically deconstructed Christendom. It’s time to turn the tables, deconstruct the antichrist narrative, and rebuild the narrative of Genesis through the Revelation. It is either Jesus Christ or the Antichrist.
The effect of books, writing, journals on human society is undeniable. Control of human society means control of what is read, written, and proclaimed (preached, taught, assigned). There is “The Narrative” that emerges from the Bible, and there are other narratives that exist in contrast to the Bible.
For example, from the Bible emerges the narrative of two sexes (male and female) with corresponding gender with a relationship consummated in marriage for the purpose of reproducing. An anti-Christ idea undermines this. (Why anti-Christ? Because Jesus Christ is also the “Word of God.” To be contrary to the Bible is to oppose Jesus Christ, Monarch and Creator.)
Friedrich Engels wrote a book called “The Origins of the Family, Private Property, and the State.” He lamented the fact that until his time the family was defined by the Bible and wrote a counter-narrative (and Anti-Christ narrative). As the website “In Defense of Marxism” points out: “Up until then, the view of the family was dominated by the outlook of the Five Books of Moses.”
Herbert Marcuse wrote a book called Eros and Civilization, which deconstructed the Biblical narrative of sexual roles, fostering the sexual revolution of the 1960s. His disciples (college professors) continue to propagate this counter-narrative by equating homosexuality and heterosexuality, abortion and birth.
Most famous, perhaps, is Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto, which I was required to read several times throughout my academic training (and was never required to read the first book of Moses). Marx emerges from a tradition of Atheism and proposes to free mankind from silly notiongs such as the existence of God, which (for him) was a means to control the masses, as well as pure fiction. His five stages of history are well known by undergraduates, while the Creation and the Flood are forbidden subjects.
College courses on Human Sexuality introduce a counter-narrative to sexual roles, also Anti-Christ. Teenagers are introduced to these ideas from their Priests and Prophets in the Cathedral of their religion (Professors at the University). They read the text books, discard what they had previously learned, and act accordingly — proof that men are but sheep, easily guided.
The point: Books matter. Narrative matters. What we read matters. What we are taught matters. Ideas do not emerge out of air as “logic and rationality.” Authors Moses, David, Isaiah, Matthew, Luke, Paul and John are forbidden in these Cathedrals of Secular Religion, and replaced by new (unholy) writings by Marx, Engels, Marcuse, Freud, and all of their apostles and disciples.
The University and their Books remain a religious institution, substituting one religion (Christianity) for another (atheism). What we read and are taught remains the means to control the masses (to disciple the nations), it’s just a different religion.
No one “frees themselves” by rejecting the writing of Moses and Matthew; one simply becomes a disciple of the new writings of Marx and Marcuse. One converts to a different religion. The sacraments are confession with the mouth and the engagement in some type of transgressive behavior. The music changes. Relations between humans changes. Beliefs change. Languages changes. This is a process of religious conversion, not freedom. One takes on a new master, one does not free oneself, for that is impossible as long as men are intellectually finite and physically mortal.
In a Christian Civilization, we set aside the Anti-Christ disciples and misleading scripture and resurrect the teaching of Moses and Matthew and John. It is utter foolish to believe that our current “secular” universities are anything but religious schools — it is just the wrong religion.
Fritz Berggren, PhD
Virginia
April 26, 2022
Philosophy is a requirement for cultural and society. We are facing a breakdown of culture and society because our philosophy is utterly corrupt. There is an internally consistent way of understanding that incorporates the latest realizations of the atheists with those of the Holy Scriptures. Linguistics is at the core of human thought in the same way as the Word of God is at the core of all reality. They (the atheists) are intellectually bankrupt. The Christian pre-suppositionalist thinker consciously recognizing the necessity of Word can rebuild civilization.
FB
Ideological conformity comes camouflaged in the rhetoric of tolerance and diversity.
“Tolerance” is a rhetorical lever designed to introduce previously forbidden ideas at the same time they make previously accepted ideas forbidden:
sodomy and buggery.When people say “stop the hate” what they signal is hatred toward those who disagree with their agenda.
When they say “we believe in diversity,” they really mean “we have no place for ideas that contradict our agenda.”
Truth: we really cannot all just get along. Christians are frankly idiots for pretending they ought to be tolerant and diverse.
There is nothing Biblical about everyone getting along:
This is a first principal.
Light shatters darkness — they cannot occupy the same space.
Diversity and tolerance are rhetorical levers used to invert evil and good; these terms are not Christian terms, they are terms of the Deceiver.
Q: If this is true, upon what ideas can a society be based?
A: The Hebrew and Greek Scriptures, the writings of the Holy Bible.
All of Satan’s attempts to eliminate the Word of God from society must be resisted.
Allow me to play devil’s advocate for a moment.
Ex-President Obama recently gave a speech at Stanford University. Here is a quote:
“Over time, we lose our capacity to distinguish between fact, opinion, and wholesale fiction. Or maybe we just stop caring,” he said.
This is a valid point. His answer is “curating” the Internet, but that does not answer the question, it just assigns gatekeepers, censors. How do they know fact and truth?
Here is the simple answer — if the Holy Scriptures are rejected as the fountain of knowledge and wisdom and Truth, then human society is truly lost, captives of whomever has the power to decide “fact from fiction.”
The great historical struggle of the Protestant Christians was to free the Holy Scriptures from control by bishops and prelates and unspoken languages. The most revolutionary action occurred: the Holy Scriptures were translated into languages people could read and given directly to the people.
There is a direct line of liberty from Wycliff and the Lollards to the Christian liberty of
our earliest colonies, the Pilgrims and the Puritans. This was a radical (getting to the root of the problem) movement. It birthed independence under God in North America.
The historical act of purging the Bible from government schools is the ultimate act of tyranny — the People will have no direct access to the Truth.
The fallacy of the “conservative” movement lies in that liberty can exist without Jesus Christ and the Bible — that is not an idea found in the Holy Scriptures.
Fritz Berggren, PhD
How to set your self free from the cult you are in. Recognize the cultic nature of the culture and narrative that dominates the west. Freedom begins between the ears.
The Jews are not “God’s chosen people.” Some Christians criticize this position and rail against “Replacement Theology” as some kind of heresy. In fact, “replacement theology” is as legitimate as the replacement of Judas Iscariot with Matthias.
Judas Iscariot was replaced. Another man filled his ministry. His ministry and calling did not go away, but Judas did. Someone filled that gap. Judas is a type of the Jew, starting with his name, Judas, and linked to his town, Iscariot/Kerioth, located in the land of Judea.
Jesus Christ (God) himself called Judas Iscariot to the ministry — it was Judas’ calling and purpose. Jesus did not make a mistake when he called Judas. Never-the-less, Judas turned aside and went his own way and the disciples understood that he had to be replaced. So Matthias stepped into his ministry and took his place. Judas was replaced.
Gods intent to replace the ancient Nation of Israel was clear from its very inception — God himself told Moses to stand aside so he could wipe them out and start a new nation afresh from Moses. This replacement would be fulfilled in Jesus Christ — who was the fulfillment of both Moses (who willed to be sacrificed for His people), and from Him (Jesus), from which a new race would be born. That ancient nation was a stiff-necked and hard hearted people who always were resisting the Holy Spirit. Stephen encapsulates this in Acts 7 when he reminds them that they rejected both Joseph and Moses as well as killed the prophets and became the murders of the Righteous One.
Jesus Christ told the Jews that they would be replaced. He told Jerusalem that your house would be left desolate and cursed the fig tree (a type of Israel) with eternal barrenness. And in the parable of the wedding feast, those invited refused to come, and God replaced them with other guests. …