Browsed by
Tag: Nationalism

One’s extended bloodline — from ancestors to progeny — is the most valid human relationship. To embrace one’s bloodline (one’s Nation) is to resist the deracinating Borg or the current totalitarian system.

No Christianity Without Christian Nations

No Christianity Without Christian Nations

It is apparent that there can be no Christianity without Christian
Nations.  The Gospel Jesus Christ is incapable of existing as a co-equal “religion” with other “religions,” including the religion that now dominates the secular West, which is very much a religion (faith, philosophy, worldview) with its own priestly and prophetic caste (the University Professors) along they their evangelists (the mass media) and teachers (public school indoctrinators). It is a religious as any other religion, yet so dominant people don’t even see it as a religion.  

In 1300, no European was aware that he was a “Roman Catholic,” he was just a man that lived in those times — so to say that he was a Christian was not a distinguishing factor in those times. All were.  Unfortunately secularism has become just as dominant in the West today.

Christianity can expand.  And Christianity can contract.  But it cannot exist steady state as a co-equal among lies such as Islam,  Judaism, or Secularism. 

Read More Read More

Race War

Race War

Race War.  This is something White Americans are horrified to talk about.  Because to contemplate a race war is to admit that racial differences are a fundamental component of human identity. 

To self-identify as a White — which I did not do until my later middle age — is a revolutionary act.  Whites are terrified of identifying as White.  Because to do is is to reject their own secular religion that says ‘we are all one.’

Only Whites are told they cannot have a racial identity — because if they have a racial identity they are called “racists.”

The propaganda machine in the United States — from the public schools to the press oligarchy — have convinced most Americans that off all the sins in the world, “racism” is the unforgivable sin.  And that the only people who can be “racists” are Whites; and that a White cannot ever free himself from the guilt of racism.

Whites must reject this guilt manipulation and must do what every other racial group in America has been told to do: Accept who they are, be proud and work together to strengthen their position.

Read More Read More

Christian Violence, III

Christian Violence, III

I’ve been meditating on violence for couple of weeks now, and I observe that violence is like a dance. It has beginning, a middle, and an end.  There is a ceremony to it. It requires two parties, at least. More for line dancing.  It can be beautiful to behold and also ugly.

Now I’m not talking about the personal application of kinetic force; I don’t know anything about that.  That’s not what this series is about. Sure, I can shoot a gun —  everyone should have some basics on that just for safety’s sake, just like they should know how to tie a knot, swim, drive a car, and slice a turkey at Thanksgiving. 


I’m thinking about violence as a part of the world we live in.  Violence is a regular and steady component of every civilization that I am familiar with.  I mean, the United States is “that” nation that is constantly at war — we have been at war for more of our history than we have been at peace.  Inside the US, there is constant violence ( I’m not just talking street crimes — those hold no interest to me).  Armed government workers (policemen) and prisons are fundamental parts of our society; America would not be America without our own domestic standing army of “policemen” and the largest prison system, per capita, on the planet.  Those are institutions of violence.  We now have more armed federal civilian government workers than the entire U.S. Marine Corps.  And this does not include state, county and local law enforcement.

But that’s not what this article is about, either. Others can wax quite elegantly about that.  

I want to talk about how the dance starts.

There is a ritual to beginning violence.

Read More Read More

Christian Violence, II

Christian Violence, II

It perturbs the secular mind to have a ideology (besides their own) that can justify violence.   Their view of “religion” is that is ought remain passive and open to the advances of secular influence.   As in, “religion is a private matter,” a “matter of faith and conscience.”  Unless a Christian conscience opposes something like homosexuality or abortion and then the Christian is told “not to impose” their “religious” beliefs on others.   So much for toleration — it has always been a one way street.

But the subject is violence.  When might a Christian kill?

Of course a man ought resort to violence in order to defend his wife and children (and himself) from death or severe bodily harm.  Those men who have abnegated this role to the police are very trusting — sometimes it works out.  But mostly the murders take the initiative and by the time the police are called the crime is done, a child or wife destroyed, and an “investigation” may be started.  Once in while they actually catch a criminal, assuming he is fairly low on the social pecking order.

Who is not low on the social order?  Armies, police, cartels, gangs, and hired guns.  These folks almost never see judicial repercussions for killing — it is a “protected” sort of killing for police and the military.  And an unacknowledged practice for other professional practitioners of violence. It  could “businessmen” who compete by killing those who get in their way.  And woe to a policeman who dares challenge their power.

In Mexico most killings are not even investigated.  Do you think communities there have an interest in protecting themselves?  In one town the police were disbanded because they all worked for the Cartel.  So calling 911 is never and option for them.  Imagine that poor trusting Mormon family that was slaughtered.   No one was going to come to their aid.  They trusted and died.

Read More Read More

Christian Violence

Christian Violence

Ragnar Redbeard wrote a book called “Might Is Right” and I could not agree more with that idea.   He who is strongest makes the rules.  And of course that Strong Man is the Lord I serve.  One of Jesus’ names is the Captains of the Lord’s Hosts (Armies).

I have written elsewhere that God is not God because God is good, but rather God is good because God is God.  Might Makes Right is simply a corollary of that.   And this ties directly into the legitimacy of violence.  God does not meet some external standard of “goodness,” God sheds goodness and rightness like we shed hair and dry skin.  What is good is a byproduct of Him — Goodness and Rightness  are derivatives of Him, not some universal external (to God) standard.

I wonder at those who interest themselves in asking Christians whether or not they eschew violence.  Because (they imply), a Christian would never impose his will by force.  (As if God would not impose His will by force — of course He will!)

Governments and politicians with police, soldiers, and an industrial scale prison system  rule by, with, and through violence.  For them to ask a somone — “do you eschew violence?” is the cougar asking the bunny if it promises to never defend itself.  

Politicians covet armed guards as symbols of rank  and the might to remain in power.    No President or Congressman that I know of has ever asked their  body-guards  to disarm and stand down.  When they ask citizens to disarm, they seek subjects to rule, not citizens to represent.

Those politicians are not against violence —  they seek their own monopoly of violence — their goal is absolute power through  which they alone define what is “right.” 

Might makes right.

Read More Read More

The Racism Racket — Why It Must Be Undermined

The Racism Racket — Why It Must Be Undermined

This whole concept of “racism” is a set up by the Great Accuser to accuse Jesus Christ of the greatest sin in history — “racism!”

I am trying to undermine the whole concept of “racism.”
I reject the entire presupposition underlying “don’t be racist.”
I laugh at those who try to earn a merit badge that says, “I’m not a racist.”

Anyone who tries to justify himself by saying “I’m not a racist” has already ceded the argument — this very statement presumes  “I agree that racism is the moral standard.”   If you say this about yourself, you’ve already enslaved yourself to a false narrative.

Free men need to liberate themselves from guilt manipulation — everything  can be boiled down to “racism” by the accusers when they don’t like something.  That is slavery.   This is important on its own for a free people, but it isn’t even the most important thing.

Here is the bigger point: Salvation is based on blood line.

Read More Read More

Diversity and Reality: the Non-Viability of Forced Integration

Diversity and Reality: the Non-Viability of Forced Integration

The stark failure of economic Marxism— classical Marxism — in the Soviet Union and China is universally recognized.   There just aren’t many classical Marxists left who want a society that looks like the old USSR nor China under Mao — it just didn’t work.

People woke up.  Nobody that is productive wants to share their wealth with the unproductive. And if they are forced to, history proves that they join the unproductive and nothing works at all.   

The abolition of private property is against human nature and that is OK.

  It used to be, in the earlier days of the USSR, that anyone whispering such heresy would be hauled off to a re-education center to rot for a few years.  They would be stripped of privileges (everything is a privilege in a totalitarian society, even the right to eat and breathe), lose their job, education, home, children and off they would go as someone truly the enemy of humanity, deplorable people, non-citizens.

Flag of London
Flag of London

In 2019 the totalitarian impulse strives not for forced sharing of property, rather it is a forced belief that “we are all equal,” and “diversity is good,” and “we must integrate.”  And a lot of people, perhaps most, don’t even question this, just like most Russians didn’t question Marxism in 1950. For to question is to become a heretic, a deplorable, a non-citizen and to risk assault and the loss of ones education and livelihood.

Yet this moral demand for integration/diversity is as unnatural and unsustainable as the demand for the abolition of private property.  It is truly inhuman.

So let me confess my sins, Comrade.

Read More Read More

On Nationalism

On Nationalism

It’s a funny title, right? I mean, who would even bring that subject up?  Normies are terrified of the most remote association with white nationalism, or white separatism, which translates into the unforgivable sin, the Scarlett Letter of the Twenty-First Century.  It is worse — much worse — that being a child molester (I don’t see Hillary Clinton or Mitt Romney shedding any crocodile tears about Eptein’s crimes against children).

But these things need to be thought about.

 It is completely unnatural and a-historic to mix bloodlines (races) and then to expect universal harmony and joy. On the contrary, the mixing of races has always been a project of either conquest, or control.   The ancient world had no problem extinguishing bloodlines or mixing bloodlines such that nationalities (which are bloodlines) are forced to fight each other for survival instead of using their strength to resist a distant tyrant.   And once the tyrant is kicked over, the bloodlust brewing for centuries is unleashed an murder and mayhem take over.  Completing the circle, and new tyrant takes over and enforces order by their own violence.  Consider the fate of Yugoslavia over the last thirty years and you get the idea.   The nations broke apart and started the melee.  An external Force imposed “peace” through a campaign of aerial bombardment upon peoples of no relation to them whatsoever.

You and I have neighbors.  Me, and mine, live in my home. We have fences that are respected.  My neighbor is free to knock on my door and say hello and even ask for a favor, a cup of sugar, or whatever it is. And the better we get a long, the more likely I am to render assistance.  But that neighbor has no right to enter my home. He has no right to stand up on my lawn or even walk up my driveway.   He has no right to sit on my couch nor speak arrogantly toward me or my family when he is in my home.

Read More Read More

How to Get the Races (Bloodlines) to Live in Peace

How to Get the Races (Bloodlines) to Live in Peace

There is a project to force the integration of bloodlines.  This is Blacks.  Asians. Mexicans.  Europeans.  So-Called “Indigenous” peoples.  Forced integration into Europe and North America.  (But racial purification in Southern Africa — exterminating the Whites — seems to be ignored. Ironic how hypocritical this is.)

The theory of the Liberal Progressive Westerners is that we all must learn to be tolerant and get along and that the “bad” people aren’t the backward uneducated non-Whites (this is implied in their argument), rather the White’s themselves, because upon whom else will they ply their guilt manipulation? Certainly not the oppressed non-whites!

And so when they come, by the millions, and they drive over people, and shoot people, and knife people, and bomb people, and rape white boys and girls, and cut the clitoris off of young girls — it becomes the White’s problem (in their mind) for not sufficiently tow-towing to whatever it is they want.

By and large, the violence comes from Muslims — attacks from Other onto the Whites. 

When it is Black on Black (Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore), or Latino on Latino or Black/Latino violence it is about turf, money, drugs, and street power and, of course, White oppression.  So the “Progressives” ignore all that.

But the Other on White violence is always justified by the apologists for mass mixing and racial immigration because they hate the narrative of Genesis.

How do they think this will work?

Read More Read More

Racial Solidarity is Inherently Anti-Totalitarian

Racial Solidarity is Inherently Anti-Totalitarian

For all the supporters of a state Palestine, of Israel, of the Latino community, of Black Lives Matter, Mecha, La Raza, the AdL, or the racial reconstruction of South Africa, Rhodesia or any organization, state, or group motivated by racial solidarity (even the Congressional Black Caucus and Hispanic Caucus), why in the world can’t they support the idea of White solidarity?   Why would they deny to others a right they claim for themselves?

White people need to wake up and realize that the real perpetrators of hate speech are the the moral posers who call white people fascists and racists and nazi’s and haters.  Anyone who calls a white man a “racist” is spewing hatred.  And if they say, “what if the are?” the the response is simply “are you justifying calling a black man a racial ephithet because they are?”  It’s the same logic.  They’ll howl and scream and refuse to listen, but that’s always the way it is with the left, the use logic when it works and use emotion and violence rationality doesn’t get them what they want.

Embracing the “racist” as legitimate is a mistaken as embracing the “N-word” as legitimate. The term is a pure pejorative design to accuse without proof or logic or rationality; it is a crime of thought for which no atonement can be made nor innocence proved. It is a term of accusation invented by the Great Accuser and should be rejected wholesale.  There is no way out of this mess until those who would be free of guilt manipulation wake up and reject this term wholesale.

What kind of hypocrisy is it to support racial movements for non-whites and yet tell white’s they are “nazi’s” when they do what makes sense to every other ethnic community?

This is so profoundly illogical and inconsistent that it is a testament to the blindness of mankind that million of whites go along with this non-sense.   White’s ought to be as self-organized and self-interested as every other racial grouping without apologizing for it.

Read More Read More